Keith D. Milby :: blog

It is amazing to me and I assume a few others how ridiculous this whole mess over the naming of a teddy bear after what’s his name, causing such a fervor. We have Sudanese radical Muslims rioting in the street calling for this teacher to be executed.

I have read the condimnations from Muslim clerics, officials or whatever but I have to say I take it with a grian of salt. I just can’t take them seriously. I think most of it comes from them being expected to say something. I will be more impressed with actions. I have been burned time and again with CIAR consistently denouncing most crap from these radicals with exceptions and a big ol’ “BUT” in the middle.

Until supposed peace living Muslims separate themselves from the crazies, I am just not going to buy it. I have seen too much evidence of Muslims saying one thing to appease non Muslims and turn around and tell another story to Muslims.

Source: Thousands of Islamic fanatics wielding knives demand jailed teddy bear teacher is executed

What good are unions for anymore? I realize the need for them in the beginning. It was during a time in which federal labor laws were non existent and employers were doing a horrible job in human relations.

But that is not the case anymore. We have labor laws. We have the EEOC. Hell we have a Labor Department.

So what good are they for today?

Currently I see them as nothing more than a very large voting block for the democrat party. Raising big bucks through forced union dues. I also see them as their own worst enemy. Restricting companies competitiveness in the market is not a good thing in a free market. Refusing to change with the times will result in unions going the way of the dinosaur.

Big companies that are forced to deal with them are finding ways of not dealing with them. Relocating jobs. Using efficiency experts to figure out how to get along without more union members. Automation to rid themselves of even more. It is very likely that unions will eventually negotiate themselves out of existence.

Last question. Will that be a bad thing?

…but I think the media is for thinking he and his administration is.

It has been clear from the very beginning, even before he was sworn in, that the media was doing every thing they could to make Bush and his administration look incompetent. From his very election that they still see as illegitimate. How he handled 9-11, the aftermath, The Afghan War, The Iraq War, Katrina, the floods, the fires, the everything. I think quite the opposite has taken place. Just look at how much the media has lost in reputation since 2000.

From the beginning I think Bush realized the media was never going to be on his side. That no matter what he said or what he did, the media had an agenda and they were going to stick to it. Bush could have brought about world peace. The media would find away to fault him for it on in the very least not give him credit.

So I think when history is written by the historians long after I am gone. It will finally be realized that this was a time of a great leader and how he contributed to a revolution in the world and in the media. A media that was so corrupt on perceived power it brought about their down fall and the birth of a new media that was controlled by everyone and no one.

Source: Mismanaging the Infowar

Now the the Supreme Court has decided to take up the D.C. Handgun Ban, expect a full on assault from the liberal leftest media here at home and abroad. They will use the power of their media positions to mislead, spin, misuse facts and figures and when neccessary, just outright lie to advance the media and the liberal progressive lefts agenda to ban guns all together.

Of course as anyone with half a brain knows, trying to ban weapons such as hand guns is a futile effort in America. In that it only takes the weapons out of the hands of innocent, law abiding citizens. Leaving them defenseless to the criminal elements that choose not to obey the law that bans the hand guns.

Now here is the relevant part of the Second Amendment and the reason the Left will lose.

A well-regulated Militia being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.

Now to break it out in it’s relevant parts:

• A well-regulated Militia being necessary to the security of a free state,
• the right of the people to keep and bear arms
• shall not be infringed.

As many nut jobs on the left try and get away with, that the Second Amendment was only intended for State Militias, this is not true. It not only allows for a well-regulated Militia being necessary to the security of a free state, but it also allows for the right of the people to keep and bear arms. Lastly and very clearly it states that these rights shall not be infringed.

Now if for some reason Hell freezes over, pigs begin to fly and cows start jumping over the moon and the Supreme Court allows D.C. to continue to ban hand guns, then I would expect a revolution, the likes that have never been seen, well since the last Revolution of 1812.

Sources:
US Supreme Court ponders gun law
Eugene Volokh

No I am not referring to Teddy “The Swimmer” Kennedy’s checkered past. John F. Kennedy’s or Robert F. Kennedy’s womanizing. Or any of the other sordid affairs that make the Kennedy Klan a laughing stock in American History. Hey, everyones family has some skeletons in the closet. Theirs just happen to be very public.

The one that I am writing of today deals with the Kennedy’s wrong doing as it pertains to the Cape Wind Project. Teddy and Bobby Jr. along with a number of the rich elite friends have been doing everything in their power to distroy the man behind the project. These are the very men who complain and complain about the use of alternative energy just as long as it is not in their back yard. Literally!

The book about it all is here.

Shame on the Kennedy Family and all of their brood forever.